Debate: Abstinence-only vs. comprehensive sex education – Debatepedia.
Abstinence-only education in our schools continue to gain momentum, despite increasing evidence that the programs are doing little to alleviate the extraordinarily high rates of teenage pregnancy in the United States. The Bush Administration were vocal advocates of abstinence-only education.
Though studies show more than half of teenagers between the ages of 15-19 are sexually active (Moore, Driscoll and Lindberg, A Statistical Portrait of Adolescent Sex, Contraception and Childbearing, 1998), more than $100 million is spent by the federal government in programs that censor information about safe-sex practices.
These abstinence-only programs teach religious ideologies and stereotypes as scientific fact .Every reputable sexuality education organization and the American Medical Association have denounced abstinence-only education.
Abstinence-only is not effective at reducing teen sex rates. Abstinence-only does not help decrease STD infection rates. Abstinence-only wrongly bashes all non-marital sex.
The use of virginity pledges in these course often are useless, as the prevent nothing and are frequently broken.
Abstinence-only sex education is immoral, scientifically inaccurate, wasteful, and just plain wrong.